location: Current position: Home >> Scientific Research >> Paper Publications

Uncertainty Quantification in Machine Learning Modeling for Multi-Step Time Series Forecasting: Example of Recurrent Neural Networks in Discharge Simulations

Hits:

Indexed by:Journal Papers

First Author:Song, Tianyu

Correspondence Author:Ding, W (reprint author), Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Hydraul Engn, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China.

Co-author:Ding, Wei,Liu, Haixing,Wu, Jian,Zhou, Huicheng,Chu, Jinggang

Date of Publication:2020-03-01

Journal:WATER

Included Journals:SCIE

Volume:12

Issue:3

Key Words:uncertainty quantification; Machine Learning; Deep Learning; Long Short-Term Memory; time-series forecasting; discharge simulation

Abstract:As a revolutionary tool leading to substantial changes across many areas, Machine Learning (ML) techniques have obtained growing attention in the field of hydrology due to their potentials to forecast time series. Moreover, a subfield of ML, Deep Learning (DL) is more concerned with datasets, algorithms and layered structures. Despite numerous applications of novel ML/DL techniques in discharge simulation, the uncertainty involved in ML/DL modeling has not drawn much attention, although it is an important issue. In this study, a framework is proposed to quantify uncertainty contributions of the sample set, ML approach, ML architecture and their interactions to multi-step time-series forecasting based on the analysis of variance (ANOVA) theory. Then a discharge simulation, using Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), is taken as an example. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network, a state-of-the-art DL approach, was selected due to its outstanding performance in time-series forecasting, and compared with simple RNN. Besides, novel discharge forecasting architecture is designed by combining the expertise of hydrology and stacked DL structure, and compared with conventional design. Taking hourly discharge simulations of Anhe (China) catchment as a case study, we constructed five sample sets, chose two RNN approaches and designed two ML architectures. The results indicate that none of the investigated uncertainty sources are negligible and the influence of uncertainty sources varies with lead-times and discharges. LSTM demonstrates its superiority in discharge simulations, and the ML architecture is as important as the ML approach. In addition, some of the uncertainty is attributable to interactions rather than individual modeling components. The proposed framework can both reveal uncertainty quantification in ML/DL modeling and provide references for ML approach evaluation and architecture design in discharge simulations. It indicates uncertainty quantification is an indispensable task for a successful application of ML/DL.

Pre One:优选雨量站权重改进降雨输入的洪水预报方法

Next One:Reference Point Based Multi-Objective Optimization of Reservoir Operation: a Comparison of Three Algorithms