Qr code
DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Login 中文
Wang Zhelong

Professor
Supervisor of Doctorate Candidates
Supervisor of Master's Candidates


Main positions:Professor, Head of Lab of Intelligent System
Other Post:自动化技术研究所所长
Gender:Male
Alma Mater:University of Durham
Degree:Doctoral Degree
School/Department:School of Control Science and Engineering
Discipline:Control Theory and Control Engineering. Pattern Recognition and Intelligence System. Detection Technology and Automation Device
Business Address:Lab of Intelligent System
http://lis.dlut.edu.cn/

Contact Information:0411-84709010 wangzl@dlut.edu.cn
E-Mail:wangzl@dlut.edu.cn
Click: times

Open time:..

The Last Update Time:..

Adaptive gait detection based on foot-mounted inertial sensors and multi-sensor fusion

Hits : Praise

Indexed by:期刊论文

Date of Publication:2019-12-01

Journal:INFORMATION FUSION

Included Journals:SCIE、EI

Volume:52

Page Number:157-166

ISSN No.:1566-2535

Key Words:Gait analysis; Body-worn sensors; Machine learning; Hidden Markov model (HMM); Neural network (NN)

Abstract:Gait detection plays an important role in areas where spatial-temporal gait parameters are needed. Inertial sensors are now sufficiently small in size and light in weight for collection of human gait data with body sensor networks (BSNs). However, gait detection methods usually rely on careful sensor alignment and a set of rule-based thresholds, which are brittle or difficult to implement. This paper presents an adaptive method for gait detection, which models human gait with a hidden Markov model (HMM), and employs a neural network (NN) to deal with the raw measurements and feed the HMM with classifications. Six gait events are involved for a detailed analysis, i.e., heel strike, foot flat, mid-stance, heel off, toe off, and mid-swing. In order to obtain enough gait data for training a gait model, the gait events are labeled by a rule-based detection method, in which the predefined rules are verified with an optical motion capture system. Experiments were conducted by nine subjects, based on a dual-sensor configuration with one sensor on each foot. Detection performance is quantified using metrics of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, and the averaged performance values are 98.11%, 94.32% and 98.86% respectively with a timing error less than 2.5 ms.