刘琳琳

个人信息Personal Information

副教授

硕士生导师

性别:女

毕业院校:大连理工大学

学位:博士

所在单位:化工学院

学科:化学工程

办公地点:大连理工大学西部校区化工实验楼D-317

联系方式:0411-84986301

电子邮箱:liulinlin@dlut.edu.cn

扫描关注

论文成果

当前位置: 中文主页 >> 科学研究 >> 论文成果

Risk management optimization framework for the optimal deployment of carbon capture and storage system under uncertainty

点击次数:

论文类型:期刊论文

发表时间:2019-10-01

发表刊物:RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS

收录刊物:EI、SCIE

卷号:113

ISSN号:1364-0321

关键字:Carbon capture and storage (CCS); Uncertainty; Mixed integer linear programming (MILP); Stochastic programming; Risk management

摘要:In order to meet the CO2 reduction target and realize cleaner production, large emission sources have two options: investing in carbon capture and storage (CCS) system and/or paying surcharge for carbon tax. CCS system requires industry to make huge investment in infrastructure and the cost of making improper decisions on CCS is substantial. Many factors can impact the successful deployment of commercial-scale CCS, including significant uncertainty regarding carbon policy, technology and engineering performance. In this study, a two-stage stochastic mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model is formulated to explore the relationship between these two reduction options by minimizing expected total cost (ETC) for CO2 reduction, considering carbon tax uncertainty. Furthermore, to assess the risk imposed by the uncertainty, three financial risk metrics are introduced for risk management and each metric is formulated as secondary objective to ETC in a multi-objective optimization model with two objectives. The trade-offs between the economic and risk objectives are obtained via the epsilon-constraint method. At last, a case of power plants in Northeast China is studied. Results show that the risk-neutral solution may confront high risk or even be infeasible in some extreme scenarios, and the carbon tax price of no less than $ 50/t is recommended for policy-makers. In risk-management cases, to control the risk, variability index metric is reduced from $ 40 x 10(8) to $ 0, probability financial metric is reduced from 0.20 to 0.12 and downside risk metric is reduced from $ 27.09 x 10(8) to $ 13.38 x 10(8) at the expense of increasing ETC.