![]() |
个人信息Personal Information
教授
博士生导师
硕士生导师
性别:男
毕业院校:日本长冈技术科技大学
学位:博士
所在单位:运营与物流管理研究所
学科:管理科学与工程
办公地点:经济管理学院新楼D412
联系方式:辽宁省大连市甘井子区凌工路2号 大连理工大学 经济管理学院 邮编:116024 电话:0411-84709425
电子邮箱:jinchun@dlut.edu.cn
A novel framework towards viable Cloud Service Selection as a Service (CSSaaS) under a fuzzy environment
点击次数:
论文类型:期刊论文
发表时间:2020-03-01
发表刊物:FUTURE GENERATION COMPUTER SYSTEMS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ESCIENCE
收录刊物:EI、SCIE
卷号:104
页面范围:74-91
ISSN号:0167-739X
关键字:Cloud Service Selection; Cloud computing; Fuzzy Linear Best Worst Method (FLBWM); Quality of Service (QoS); Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM); Triangular Fuzzy Numbers (TFNs)
摘要:Making a decision to shift from in-house to cloud computing is not an ordinary one. It involves cautious consideration of several key factors. The unavailability of precise information, ambiguous criteria and uncertainty of qualitative adjudication of decision makers further add to the problem. Enormous complexity and limitations of existing approaches make the service selection process extremely challenging and less trustworthy. To address such challenges, in this paper (1) we propose a novel framework to pave the way towards viable Cloud Service Selection as a Service (CSSaaS): (2) we implement the ranking/recommendation service of CSSaaS framework for viable cloud service ranking/selection under a fuzzy environment. For this purpose, we propose a novel Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach named Fuzzy Linear Best Worst Method (FLBWM). Contrary to crisp MCDM methods, FLBWM is robust, requires less data, produces authentic results and effectively handles imprecise/inexact information. To support the research, we present two illustrative applications including (1) selection of high-CPU compute optimized service and (2) selection of Infrastructure as a Service (laaS), using FLBWM. We perform a thorough comparative analysis to evaluate the performance and rank correlation of FLBWM with other decision-making methods. Moreover, we examine FLBWM in terms of sensitivity analysis, suitability for collaborative decision making, suitability under changes in alternatives and uncertainty management. The results favor the proposed approach. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.