潘宝峰

个人信息Personal Information

教授

博士生导师

硕士生导师

性别:男

毕业院校:大连理工大学

学位:博士

所在单位:交通运输系

学科:道路与铁道工程. 市政工程

办公地点:综合实验4号楼533

联系方式:13942656326

电子邮箱:pbfeng@dlut.edu.cn

扫描关注

论文成果

当前位置: 中文主页 >> 科学研究 >> 论文成果

Three-Dimensional Micromechanical Complex-Modulus Prediction of Asphalt Concrete Considering the Aggregate Interlocking Effect

点击次数:

论文类型:期刊论文

发表时间:2017-10-01

发表刊物:JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING

收录刊物:Scopus、SCIE、EI

卷号:29

期号:10

ISSN号:0899-1561

关键字:Micromechanics; Viscoelasticity; Particulate composite; Mixtures; Mastics; Binders

摘要:The complex modulus (E*) is a fundamental material property extensively used for characterizing the viscoelastic behavior of asphalt concrete. In recent years, numerous micromechanics-based models have been proposed for predicting the asphalt concrete E*. Unfortunately, few of them are capable of rationally considering the aggregate interlocking effect that plays a vital role in the reinforcement mechanisms of asphalt concrete. To address this issue, this study presents a new approach, in which the asphalt mastic matrix phase in the traditional models is substituted with a new equivalent matrix phase that incorporates both the viscoelastic properties of asphalt mastic and the effect of aggregate interlock reinforcement. Two interlock factor functions, which were initially proposed for characterizing the confinement dependency of the triaxial E* of asphalt concrete, are introduced into the two springs, two parabolic elements and one dashpot (2S2P1D) model representing the complex shear modulus (G*) of the original asphalt mastic matrix phase. The feasibility and effectiveness of the approach is demonstrated by means of the traditional two-layer built-in (TLB) and generalized self-consistent (GSC) micromechanics models. The results show that the proposed method overcomes the shortcomings of underpredicting the storage and loss moduli of asphalt concrete over the intermediate-and low-frequency range in the traditional micromechanics methods. Also, without changing any original geometries, the advantages of simplicity and practicability of the traditional models remain. Finally, recommendations for future research are discussed in brief. (C) 2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.