个人信息Personal Information
教授
博士生导师
硕士生导师
任职 : 土木工程系主任
性别:男
毕业院校:同济大学
学位:博士
所在单位:土木工程系
学科:桥梁与隧道工程. 防灾减灾工程及防护工程. 流体力学
办公地点:桥隧研发基地306
电子邮箱:fuyouxu@dlut.edu.cn
Experimental Investigations on the Nonlinear Torsional Flutter of a Bridge Deck
点击次数:
论文类型:期刊论文
发表时间:2017-08-01
发表刊物:JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING
收录刊物:Scopus、SCIE、EI
卷号:22
期号:8
ISSN号:1084-0702
关键字:Bridge; Nonlinear flutter; Wind-tunnel test; Limit cycle oscillation (LCO); Nonlinear mathematical model; Aerodynamic parameters
摘要:The nonlinear flutter featured by the limit cycle oscillation (LCO) is a typical aeroelastic phenomenon for bluff decks and/or streamlined decks at large incidence angles. In this study, the flutter characteristics of a streamlined deck were investigated by using comprehensive wind-tunnel tests, and a nonlinear mathematical model was introduced to model the aeroelastic behavior of the nonlinear torsional flutter oscillation. The nonlinear aerodynamic force is the major source of the nonlinear flutter. The nonlinear flutter LCO corresponds to a state in which the energy absorbed by the linear damping and the energy dissipated by the nonlinear damping are balanced within an oscillation period. On the basis of the instantaneous amplitude and instantaneous frequency calculated by using the normalized Hilbert transform, a system identification method was developed to simultaneously extract the linear and nonlinear aerodynamic parameters. The efficacy of the nonlinear mathematical model and the identification accuracy of aerodynamic parameters were validated by two examples. The sensitivities of aerodynamic parameters to the signal length were studied, and the corresponding causes were revealed. The linear aerodynamic damping parameter and structural damping ratio are the dominant parameters for determining the critical flutter wind speed. For the nonlinear torsional flutter, a practical approach was proposed to predict the critical reduced wind speeds and the LCO amplitudes with different structural damping ratios, and its accuracy was verified by comparing the experimental results. (C) 2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.