张秀芳

个人信息Personal Information

副研究员

硕士生导师

性别:女

毕业院校:大连理工大学

学位:博士

所在单位:土木工程系

学科:结构工程

电子邮箱:zhxfang@dlut.edu.cn

扫描关注

论文成果

当前位置: 中文主页 >> 科学研究 >> 论文成果

Shear Behavior of Reinforced Ultrahigh Toughness Cementitious Composite Beams without Transverse Reinforcement

点击次数:

论文类型:期刊论文

发表时间:2012-10-01

发表刊物:JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING

收录刊物:SCIE、EI、Scopus

卷号:24

期号:10

页面范围:1283-1294

ISSN号:0899-1561

关键字:Ultrahigh toughness cementitious composite (UHTCC); Cracking pattern; Shear strength; Postcracking reserve strength; Shear strength prediction

摘要:The shear behavior of reinforced ultrahigh toughness cementitious composite (RUHTCC) beams without transverse reinforcement was investigated in the present paper, in which UHTCC has tensile strain-hardening behavior due to the steady propagation of multiple fine cracks. A total of 15 simply supported beams were subjected to a concentrated load at midspan, of which nine beams were RUHTCC beams and six beams were RC counterpart beams. The varied parameters were shear span-effective depth ratio and longitudinal reinforcement ratio. The experimental results showed that an enhanced ultimate shear strength that was about two times larger than that of an RC beam was obtained for slender beams with use of UHTCC, whereas only a marginal improvement was obtained for short beams. All tested RUHTCC beams presented a diagonal multiple-cracking mode and a stable diagonal crack propagation process. The maximum crack width was controlled within 0.1 mm at the service state and the high postcracking shear reserve strength was obtained, which means that there is no need to limit the minimum web reinforcement ratio in the engineering design for a RUHTCC beam. On the basis of the present test and tests by other investigators, a group of empirical formulae are suggested for predicting the ultimate shear strength of fiber-reinforced beams without stirrups. A good agreement between the predicted strength and tested value was shown, with the mean and coefficient of variation of the ratio between them about 1.02 and 0.10, respectively. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000505. (C) 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.