Hits:
Indexed by:Journal Papers
Date of Publication:2020-02-01
Journal:INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
Included Journals:EI、SCIE
Volume:106
Issue:9-10
Page Number:4169-4181
ISSN No.:0268-3768
Key Words:Feasible region; Interference detection; Non-linear error; High-precision machining; Five-axis machining
Abstract:Five-axis machine is one of the most versatile machine tools in complex surface machining while the machining interference occurs easily. To avoid the adverse consequences caused by interference, interference detection, and feasible region, solution are proposed. However, with the required processing accuracy of the complex surface parts increasing, the common feasible region solution is generally difficult to achieve. The error caused by the tool orientation variation along the tool path, just the non-linear error, may exceed the specified tolerance. Considering that both the interference problem and the non-linear problem could be solved by modifying the tool orientation, this study proposes a feasible region solution for tool orientation with the constraint of non-linear error, which can avoid tool interference and achieve high geometric accuracy for tool path planning in the extreme high-precision machining. The detection region that corresponds to the tool orientation at cutter contact (CC) point is calculated to avoid the collision firstly, and the feasible region of tool orientation for a certain CC point is established. After building the tool path equations between two adjacent CC points, the relationship between the movement angles of rotation axis and the machining error is built. By considering the non-linear error of the different rotatory axes respectively, the calculation formula for the movement angle variation of the rotation axis is deduced. Finally, according to the single point non-interference feasible region of the tool angle, the non-interference feasible region for the extreme high-precision processing is constructed with the constraint of non-linear error. A comparative experiment is carried out to verify the proposed feasible region construction method. The experimental results show that with the proposed method, the profile arithmetic average error and the maximum of profile deviation are 53 mu m and 71 mu m, respectively, which decrease by 30.13% and 32.31% compared with the conventional non-interference feasible region. The achievements have good applicability and are significant for the improvement of processing quality, which provide guidance for the extreme high-precision machining of complex surface parts.