陈悦

个人信息Personal Information

教授

博士生导师

硕士生导师

任职 : 中国工程科技创新战略研究院客座教授

性别:女

毕业院校:大连理工大学

学位:博士

所在单位:公共管理学院

学科:科学学与科技管理. 区域经济学

办公地点:大连理工大学人文楼301房间

联系方式:0411-84706082

电子邮箱:chenyue@dlut.edu.cn

扫描关注

论文成果

当前位置: 中文主页 >> 科学研究 >> 论文成果

An overview of the history of Science of Science in China based on the use of bibliographic and citation data: a new method of analysis based on clustering with feature maximization and contrast graphs

点击次数:

论文类型:期刊论文

发表时间:2021-03-05

发表刊物:SCIENTOMETRICS

卷号:125

期号:3

页面范围:2971-2999

ISSN号:0138-9130

关键字:Science of Science; China; World; Topic tracking; Feature maximization; Unsupervised learning; Diachronic analysis

摘要:In the first part of this paper, we shall discuss the historical context of Science of Science both in China and at world level. In the second part, we use the unsupervised combination of GNG clustering with feature maximization metrics and associated contrast graphs to present an analysis of the contents of selected academic journal papers in Science of Science in China and the construction of an overall map of the research topics' structure during the last 40 years. Furthermore, we highlight how the topics have evolved through analysis of publication dates and also use author information to clarify the topics' content. The results obtained have been reviewed and approved by 3 leading experts in this field and interestingly show that Chinese Science of Science has gradually become mature in the last 40 years, evolving from the general nature of the discipline itself to related disciplines and their potential interactions, from qualitative analysis to quantitative and visual analysis, and from general research on the social function of science to its more specific economic function and strategic function studies. Consequently, the proposed novel method can be used without supervision, parameters and help from any external knowledge to obtain very clear and precise insights about the development of a scientific domain. The output of the topic extraction part of the method (clustering + feature maximization) is finally compared with the output of the well-known LDA approach by experts in the domain which serves to highlight the very clear superiority of the proposed approach.