梁刚涛

个人信息Personal Information

教授

博士生导师

硕士生导师

性别:男

毕业院校:大连理工大学

学位:博士

所在单位:能源与动力学院

学科:热能工程

办公地点:能动学院826室

电子邮箱:gtliang@dlut.edu.cn

扫描关注

论文成果

当前位置: 中文主页 >> 科学研究 >> 论文成果

Pool boiling critical heat flux (CHF) - Part 1: Review of mechanisms, models, and correlations

点击次数:

论文类型:期刊论文

发表时间:2018-02-01

发表刊物:INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER

收录刊物:SCIE、EI

卷号:117

页面范围:1352-1367

ISSN号:0017-9310

关键字:Pool boiling; Critical heat flux (CHF); Surface orientation; Contact angle

摘要:Critical heat flux (CHF) is arguably the most important design and safety parameter for any heat-flux controlled boiling application. The present two-part study is focused on CHF for pool boiling from flat surfaces. The first part will review different CHF models and associated mechanisms and parametric trends, while the second part will be dedicated to assessment of CHF models and correlations. Aside from Kutateladze's 1948 pioneering CHF formulation, which is based on dimensional analysis, five different CHF mechanisms are prevalent in the literature: bubble interference, hydrodynamic instability, macro layer dryout, hot/dry spot, and interfacial lift-off. Additionally, many modifications to these mechanisms have been proposed to improve predictive accuracy in tackling the parametric influences of pressure, surface size and roughness, surface orientation, and contact angle. Among the five mechanisms, Zuber's hydrodynamic instability theory has received the most attention because of both its mechanistic formulation and theoretical appeal. More recently, the interfacial lift-off mechanism, which is also theoretically based, has received significant experimental validation, and offers the advantage of tackling different surface orientations. Overall, it is shown that, despite the large body of published pool boiling CHF literature, there are major data gaps in the coverage of relevant parameters. This points to a need for more strategically planned future experiments that would also include microphotographic analysis of near-wall interfacial features, in order to validate or dispute proposed CHF mechanisms. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.