李本文 (教授)

教授   博士生导师   硕士生导师

性别:男

毕业院校:东北大学

学位:博士

所在单位:能源与动力学院

学科:热能工程

办公地点:大连理工大学西部校区能动大楼720室

联系方式:heatli@dlut.edu.cn

电子邮箱:heatli@dlut.edu.cn

当前位置: 中文主页 >> 科学研究 >> 论文成果

Comparisons of solving procedures and computation time for Fast Cosine Transformation and Matrix Multiplication Transformation in spectral methods application

点击次数:

论文类型:期刊论文

发表时间:2016-08-17

发表刊物:NUMERICAL HEAT TRANSFER PART A-APPLICATIONS

收录刊物:SCIE、EI、Scopus

卷号:70

期号:4

页面范围:384-398

ISSN号:1040-7782

摘要:Taking the strongly nonlinear energy conservation equation and the transient diffusion equations as examples, the differences of solving procedure and the computation time are compared and discussed between the fast cosine transformation (FCT) and the matrix multiplication transformation (MMT) in the application of spectral methods. To compare the solving procedures for the energy equation, the temperature distribution in the fin with variable thermal conductivity, variable heat transfer coefficient, and internal heat generation are considered. To compare the computation time, the transient diffusion equations in 1D and 2D enclosures, which contain the Poisson operator and the source term, are analyzed. All variables are approximated by the Chebyshev polynomials and all equations are discretized by the Chebyshev-Gauss-Lobatto (CGL) collocation points in space. The comparisons indicate that the FCT can be adopted to solve the strongly nonlinear equation directly and it can provide the same accuracy as MMT does. The comparison of computation time indicates that the MMT is faster than the FCT when the grid number is small or moderate (less than 200), while, if the grid number is large (greater than 200), the FCT is more faster than the MMT.

发表时间:2016-08-17

上一条: Chebyshev collocation spectral domain decomposition method for coupled conductive and radiative heat transfer in a 3D L-shaped enclosure

下一条: Fabrication of SiC reticulated porous ceramics with multi-layered struts for porous media combustion