陈茂笃

个人信息Personal Information

教授

博士生导师

硕士生导师

性别:男

毕业院校:中科院大连化学物理研究所

学位:博士

所在单位:物理学院

学科:原子与分子物理. 光学

电子邮箱:mdchen@dlut.edu.cn

扫描关注

论文成果

当前位置: 中文主页 >> 科学研究 >> 论文成果

Quantum Dynamics of Li plus HF/DF Reaction Investigated by a State-to-State Time-dependent Wave Packet Approach

点击次数:

论文类型:期刊论文

发表时间:2015-08-01

发表刊物:CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS

收录刊物:SCIE、Scopus

卷号:28

期号:4

页面范围:415-425

ISSN号:1674-0068

关键字:Quantum wavepacket; Integral and differential cross section; Reaction rate constant; Li plus HF/DF; Isotope effect

摘要:Using the reactant coordinate based time-dependent wave packet method, on the APW potential energy surface, the differential and integral cross sections of the Li+DF/HF(v=0, j=0, 1) reactions were calculated over the collision energy range from the threshold to 0.25 eV. The initial state-specified reaction rate constants of the title reaction were also calculated. The results indicate that, compared with the Li+DF reaction, the product LiF of Li+HF reaction is a little more rotationally excited but essentially similar. The initial rotational excitation from j=0 to 1 has little effect on the Li+DF reaction. However, the rotational excitation of DF does result in a little more rotationally excited product LiF. The different cross section of both reactions is forward biased in the studied collision energy range, especially at relatively high collision energy. The resonances in the Li+HF reaction may be identifiable as the oscillations in the product ro-vibrational state-resolved integral cross sections and backward scattering as a function of collusion energy. For the Li+HF reaction, the rate constant is not sensitive to the temperature and almost has no change in the temperature range considered. For the Li+DF reaction, the rate constant increase by a factor of about 10 in the temperature range of 100-300 K. Brief comparison for the total reaction probabilities and integral cross section of the Li+HF reaction has been carried out between ours and the values reported previously. The agreement is good, and the difference should come from the better convergence of our present calculations.