![]() |
个人信息Personal Information
教授
博士生导师
硕士生导师
性别:男
毕业院校:大连理工大学
学位:博士
所在单位:公共管理学院
学科:行政管理. 科学学与科技管理
电子邮箱:xwang@dlut.edu.cn
论文成果
当前位置: 王贤文-大连理工大学 >> 科学研究 >> 论文成果Trends for nanotechnology development in China, Russia, and India
点击次数:
论文类型:期刊论文
发表时间:2009-11-01
发表刊物:JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
收录刊物:SCIE、EI、SSCI、Scopus
卷号:11
期号:8
页面范围:1845-1866
ISSN号:1388-0764
关键字:Bibliographic analysis; Citation analysis of articles and patents; Information visualization; Self-organizing maps; Nanoscience; Nanotechnology; Research and development; Technological innovation; International
摘要:China, Russia, and India are playing an increasingly important role in global nanotechnology research and development (R&D). This paper comparatively inspects the paper and patent publications by these three countries in the Thomson Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI) database and United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) database (1976-2007). Bibliographic, content map, and citation network analyses are used to evaluate country productivity, dominant research topics, and knowledge diffusion patterns. Significant and consistent growth in nanotechnology papers are noted in the three countries. Between 2000 and 2007, the average annual growth rate was 31.43% in China, 11.88% in Russia, and 33.51% in India. During the same time, the growth patterns were less consistent in patent publications: the corresponding average rates are 31.13, 10.41, and 5.96%. The three countries' paper impact measured by the average number of citations has been lower than the world average. However, from 2000 to 2007, it experienced rapid increases of about 12.8 times in China, 8 times in India, and 1.6 times in Russia. The Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), and the Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT) were the most productive institutions in paper publication, with 12,334, 6,773, and 1,831 papers, respectively. The three countries emphasized some common research topics such as "Quantum dots," "Carbon nanotubes," "Atomic force microscopy," and "Scanning electron microscopy," while Russia and India reported more research on nano-devices as compared with China. CAS, RAS, and IIT played key roles in the respective domestic knowledge diffusion.