邹德高

个人信息Personal Information

教授

博士生导师

硕士生导师

任职 : 大连理工大学水利工程学院院长、海岸和近海工程国家重点实验室副主任、辽宁省工程防灾减灾重点实验室副主任

性别:男

毕业院校:大连理工大学

学位:博士

所在单位:水利工程系

学科:水工结构工程. 防灾减灾工程及防护工程. 岩土工程

联系方式:zoudegao@dlut.edu.cn

电子邮箱:zoudegao@dlut.edu.cn

扫描关注

论文成果

当前位置: 中文主页 >> 科学研究 >> 论文成果

A two-mechanism soil-structure interface model for three-dimensional cyclic loading

点击次数:

论文类型:期刊论文

发表时间:2021-02-02

发表刊物:INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS

卷号:44

期号:15

页面范围:2042-2069

ISSN号:0363-9061

关键字:bounding surface theory; cyclic loading; plasticity; soil-structure interface; two-mechanism

摘要:A three-dimensional (3D) soil-structure interface model is proposed within the two-mechanism constitutive theory and bounding surface theory originally established for soils. The proposed model has two main characteristics: first, the model is formulated based on two different and superposed deformation mechanisms. The first mechanism is due to the stress ratio increment, and the second is due to the normal stress increment. Each mechanism induces a shear strain component and a normal strain component. The proposed model can be reduced to the conventional single-mechanism interface model. Second, the plastic modulus and stress dilatancy are defined using the bounding surface theory. The plastic flow rule under cyclic loading is modified and assumed to be dependent on both the stress state of the mapping point and the stress reversal loading direction. The proposed model was validated against the available 3D interface tests and was found to satisfactorily reflect the salient features of the interfaces under monotonic and cyclic loading paths with different normal boundaries. The problem in which the elastic normal stiffness in conventional single-mechanism interface models is often underestimated to enhance the simulation performance under varying normal stress conditions is solved by incorporating the second mechanism. And the effect of the second mechanism on the modeling behavior is discussed. The modified plastic flow direction accurately simulates the 3D cyclic shear response, and the difference between the model simulation and test result increases with the number of cycles by use of the plastic flow direction defined in conventional bounding surface theory.