李焕杰

个人信息Personal Information

副教授

硕士生导师

性别:女

毕业院校:北京大学

学位:博士

所在单位:生物医学工程学院

学科:生物医学工程

办公地点:辽宁省大连市甘井子区凌工路2号大连理工大学创新园大厦A1222

联系方式:hj_li@dlut.edu.cn

电子邮箱:hj_li@dlut.edu.cn

扫描关注

论文成果

当前位置: 中文主页 >> 科学研究 >> 论文成果

Tensor clustering on outer-product of coefficient and component matrices of independent component analysis for reliable functional magnetic resonance imaging data decomposition

点击次数:

论文类型:期刊论文

发表时间:2019-09-01

发表刊物:JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS

收录刊物:PubMed、SCIE

卷号:325

页面范围:108359

ISSN号:0165-0270

关键字:Independent component analysis (ICA); fMRI; Tensor clustering; Stability; Model order

摘要:Background: Stability of spatial components is frequently used as a post-hoc selection criteria for choosing the dimensionality of an independent component analysis (ICA) of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. Although the stability of the ICA temporal courses differs from that of spatial components, temporal stability has not been considered during dimensionality decisions.
   New method: The current study aims to (1) develop an algorithm to incorporate temporal course stability into dimensionality selection and (2) test the impact of temporal course on the stability of the ICA decomposition of fMRI data via tensor clustering. Resting state fMRI data were analyzed with two popular ICA algorithms, InfomaxICA and FastICA, using our new method and results were compared with model order selection based on spatial or temporal criteria alone.
   Results: Hierarchical clustering indicated that the stability of the ICA decomposition incorporating spatiotemporal tensor information performed similarly when compared to current best practice. However, we found that component spatiotemporal stability and convergence of the model varied significantly with model order. Considering both may lead to methodological improvements for determining ICA model order. Selected components were also significantly associated with relevant behavioral variables.
   Comparison with Existing Method: The Kullback-Leibler information criterion algorithm suggests the optimal model order for group ICA is 40, compared to the proposed method with an optimal model order of 20.
   Conclusion: The current study sheds new light on the importance of temporal course variability in ICA of fMRI data.