Qr code
DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Login 中文
张树深

Researcher
Supervisor of Doctorate Candidates
Supervisor of Master's Candidates


Gender:Male
Alma Mater:北京师范大学
Degree:Master's Degree
School/Department:环境学院
E-Mail:zhangss@dlut.edu.cn
Click: times

Open time:..

The Last Update Time:..

Current position: Home >> Scientific Research >> Paper Publications

Climatic burden of eating at home against away-from-home: A novel Bayesian Belief Network model for the mechanism of eating-out in urban China

Hits : Praise

Indexed by:期刊论文

Date of Publication:2019-02-10

Journal:SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT

Included Journals:SCIE、PubMed、SSCI、Scopus

Volume:650

Issue:Pt 1

Page Number:224-232

ISSN No.:0048-9697

Key Words:Eat away-from-home; Carbon footprint; Climate change; Urbanization; Socioeconomic transitioning; Bayesian Belief Network

Abstract:Dietary patterns of eating away-from-home (AFH) considerably differ from those of eating at home in urban China, thus generating varied carbon footprints. However, few studies have investigated the effect of eating places on diet-related climatic burden, and few have modelled the mechanism under the condition of eating-out because the decision of consumers on whether to eat AFH or at home is determined by multiple non-linear socioeconomic factors. Here, we compared the carbon footprints of eating at home and AFH using household survey data from 12 Chinese provinces, and developed a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) model to identify key factors of eating AFH. Our findings show that eating AFH leads to higher climatic burdens though respondents consume less food on average than when eating at home. However, in urban areas, the carbon footprint generated increases more rapidly from eating at-home than when eating AFH. The BBN model was found to have strong capability to predict the possibility of eating out with an accuracy of 89%. Although diet patterns and embedded carbon footprint vary considerably across provinces from northeastern to southwestern China, sufficient evidence could not be found to support the influence of geographic factors on the decision of respondents to eat AFH at large scale. Instead, individual occupation and income were found to be the two key contributors. Thus, merely estimating the carbon footprint of food consumption is currently not sufficient, but social and economic elements need to be quantitatively considered to differentiate the eating-place effect on diet-related climatic burden. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.