个人信息Personal Information
教授
博士生导师
硕士生导师
主要任职:人力资源处处长(党委教师工作部部长、党委人才办公室主任)【兼党委组织部副部长】
性别:男
毕业院校:上海交通大学
学位:博士
所在单位:生物医学工程学院
学科:生物医学工程. 信号与信息处理. 模式识别与智能系统
电子邮箱:cong@dlut.edu.cn
Tensor clustering on outer-product of coefficient and component matrices of independent component analysis for reliable functional magnetic resonance imaging data decomposition
点击次数:
论文类型:期刊论文
发表时间:2019-09-01
发表刊物:JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
收录刊物:PubMed、SCIE
卷号:325
页面范围:108359
ISSN号:0165-0270
关键字:Independent component analysis (ICA); fMRI; Tensor clustering; Stability; Model order
摘要:Background: Stability of spatial components is frequently used as a post-hoc selection criteria for choosing the dimensionality of an independent component analysis (ICA) of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. Although the stability of the ICA temporal courses differs from that of spatial components, temporal stability has not been considered during dimensionality decisions.
New method: The current study aims to (1) develop an algorithm to incorporate temporal course stability into dimensionality selection and (2) test the impact of temporal course on the stability of the ICA decomposition of fMRI data via tensor clustering. Resting state fMRI data were analyzed with two popular ICA algorithms, InfomaxICA and FastICA, using our new method and results were compared with model order selection based on spatial or temporal criteria alone.
Results: Hierarchical clustering indicated that the stability of the ICA decomposition incorporating spatiotemporal tensor information performed similarly when compared to current best practice. However, we found that component spatiotemporal stability and convergence of the model varied significantly with model order. Considering both may lead to methodological improvements for determining ICA model order. Selected components were also significantly associated with relevant behavioral variables.
Comparison with Existing Method: The Kullback-Leibler information criterion algorithm suggests the optimal model order for group ICA is 40, compared to the proposed method with an optimal model order of 20.
Conclusion: The current study sheds new light on the importance of temporal course variability in ICA of fMRI data.