Release Time:2019-03-09 Hits:
Indexed by: Journal Article
Date of Publication: 2012-07-30
Journal: JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Included Journals: EI、SCIE
Volume: 225
Page Number: 15-20
ISSN: 0304-3894
Key Words: Polypyrrole; Electroreduction; Stainless steel; Cr(VI); Potentiostatic condition; Potentiodynamic condition
Abstract: Polypyrrole (ppy)-modified electrode was used for electroreduction of Cr(VI) and showed favorable advantage with extremely higher removal percentage and current efficiency over stainless steel (SS) electrode. In potentiostatic (PS) process and in stagnant solution. ppy electrode achieved a Cr(VI) removal efficiency of 16% and a current efficiency of 23% compared to 0 for SS electrode at a potential of -0.8 V. In potentiodynamic (PD) process and in stagnant solutions, ppy electrode exhibited a Cr(VI) removal efficiency of 56% at a potential range from -0.8 to 0.8 V whereas SS electrode presented none at the same conditions. Solution stirring promoted mass transportation and dramatically improved Cr(VI) removal efficiency, achieving 92% (ppy electrode) and 18% (SS electrode) in PS process and 100% (ppy electrode) and 36% (SS electrode) in PD process at 100 rpm. ppy electrode exhibited an efficient Cr(VI) reduction at a wide potential range from -0.8 to 0.8V than the potential ranges of -0.8 to 0 V and 0-0.8 V. While ppy stability under PD condition of -0.8 to 0.8 V was not as satisfactory as PS condition at -0.8 V. but better than PS condition at 0.8 V. These results demonstrate that ppy-modified electrode in PD process may be a promising alternative for Cr(VI) electroreduction. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Prev One:Combined effects of enrichment procedure and non-fermentable or fermentable co-substrate on performance and bacterial community for pentachlorophenol degradation in microbial fuel cells
Next One:Reductive dechlorination and mineralization of pentachlorophenol in biocathode microbial fuel cells