徐立昕

个人信息Personal Information

教授

博士生导师

硕士生导师

性别:男

毕业院校:大连理工大学

学位:博士

所在单位:物理学院

学科:理论物理

办公地点:物理学院211室

联系方式:lxxu .AT. dlut.edu.cn

扫描关注

论文成果

当前位置: 中文主页 >> 科学研究 >> 论文成果

Current observational constraints to the holographic dark energy model with a new infrared cutoff via the Markov chain Monte Carlo method

点击次数:

论文类型:期刊论文

发表时间:2010-04-15

发表刊物:PHYSICAL REVIEW D

收录刊物:SCIE

卷号:81

期号:8

ISSN号:2470-0010

摘要:In this paper, the holographic dark energy model with new infrared (IR) cut-off for both the flat case and the non-flat case are confronted with the combined constraints of current cosmological observations: type Ia Supernovae, Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, current Cosmic Microwave Background, and the observational hubble data. By utilizing the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method, we obtain the best fit values of the parameters with 1 sigma, 2 sigma errors in the flat model: Omega(b)h(2) = 0.0230(-0.0010-0.0014)(+0.0008+0.0012), alpha = 0.9788(-0.0927-0.1249)(+0.1297+0.1354), beta = 0.4739(-0.0723-0.0984)(+0.0793+0.1055), Omega(de0) = 0.7869(-0.0304-0.0455)(+0.0291+0.0370), Omega(m0) = 0.2131(-0.0291-0.0370)(+0.0304+0.0455), H-0 = 70.46(-2.97-4.02)(+2.82+3.89). In the nonflat model, the constraint results are found 1 sigma, 2 sigma region; Omega(b)h(2) = 0.0229(-0.0010-0.0014)(+0.0010+0.0013), Omega(k) = 0.0014(-0.0597-0.0743)(+0.0604+0.0604), alpha = 0.9637(-0.2840-0.3333)(+0.2291+0.2894), beta = 0.4712(-0.0756-0.0961)(+01412+0.1703), Omega(de0) = 0.7829(-0.2130-0.2386)(+0.1588+0.1901), Omega(m0) = 0.2157(-0.1012-0.1241)(+0.1562+0.1800), H-0 = 70.64(-3.32-4.45)(+2.74+3.52). In the best fit holographic dark energy models, the equation of state of dark energy and the deceleration parameter at present are characterized by w(de0) = -0.9278 +/- 0.0626, q(0) = -0.5951 +/- 0.0586 (flat case) and w(de0) = -0.9501 +/- 0.1442, q(0) = -0.06164 +/- 0.0805 (flat case) and w(de0) = -0.9501 +/- 0.1442, q(0) = -0.6164 +/- 0.0805 (nonflat case). Compared to the Lambda CDM model, it is found the current combined data sets do not favor the holographic dark energy model over the Lambda CDM model.