杨明军Mingjun Yang

(教授)

 博士生导师  硕士生导师
学位:博士
性别:男
毕业院校:大连理工大学
所在单位:能源与动力学院
电子邮箱:yangmj@dlut.edu.cn

论文成果

当前位置: 中文主页 >> 科学研究 >> 论文成果

Evaluation of gas production from methane hydrates using depressurization, thermal stimulation and combined methods

发表时间:2019-03-09 点击次数:

论文名称:Evaluation of gas production from methane hydrates using depressurization, thermal stimulation and combined methods
论文类型:期刊论文
发表刊物:APPLIED ENERGY
收录刊物:SCIE、EI、ESI高被引论文、Scopus
卷号:145
页面范围:265-277
ISSN号:0306-2619
关键字:Methane hydrate-bearing sediments; Energy efficiency; Depressurization; Thermal injection; Combination production; Buffer effect
摘要:To investigate the gas production from methane hydrate-bearing sediments, the gas production processes from methane hydrate in porous media using depressurization, two-cycle warm-water injection and a combination of the two methods were characterized in this study. The methane hydrates were formed in porous media with various initial hydrate saturation (SO in a pressure vessel. The percentage of gas production, rate of gas production, and energy efficiency were obtained and compared using the three methods. The driving force of the hydrate dissociation at different stages of depressurization was analyzed and ice formation during the gas production was observed. For the two-cycle warm-water-injection method, the percentage of gas production and the energy efficiency increased with increasing of S-hi. However, due to the large amount of warm water needed to heat the porous media at the dissociation site, the percentage of gas production was lower than the other two methods under the same experimental conditions. The experimental results proved that the combined method had obvious advantages for hydrate exploitation over the depressurization and warm-water-injection method in terms of the energy efficiency, percentage of gas production and average rate of gas production, and with increasing of Shi, the advantages are enhanced. For the S-hi of 51.61%, the percentage of gas production reaches 74.87%, which had increments of 18.63% and 31.19% compared with the depressurization and warm-water-injection methods. The energy efficiency for the combined method were 31.47, 49.93 and 68.13 for S-hi of 31.90%, 4131% and 51.61%, respectively. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
发表时间:2015-05-01