高效伟

个人信息Personal Information

教授

博士生导师

硕士生导师

任职 : 国家重大专项专家组成员、教育部热防护专业组组长、国际华人计算力学协会理事、中国航空学会理事、中国航空学会强度与设计专业委员会委员、国际边界单元法协会会员、教育部高等学校航空航天类专业教学指导委员会委员

性别:男

毕业院校:Glasgow University

学位:博士

所在单位:力学与航空航天学院

办公地点:海宇楼403A

联系方式:0411-84706332

电子邮箱:xwgao@dlut.edu.cn

扫描关注

论文成果

当前位置: 中文主页 >> 科学研究 >> 论文成果

Analysis of Elastic Media with Voids Using a Mixed-Collocation Finite-Element Method

点击次数:

论文类型:期刊论文

发表时间:2017-04-01

发表刊物:JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS

收录刊物:SCIE、EI、Scopus

卷号:143

期号:4

ISSN号:0733-9399

关键字:Microdilatation theory; Porous material; Mixed finite elements; Shear locking collocation; Crack opening; Stress concentration factors

摘要:In this paper, a recently developed type of lower-order mixed finite elements is extended to model porous materials based on the microdilatation theory. These mixed finite elements are based on assuming independent linear generalized strain fields and collocating them with the generalized strains derived from primal variables (mechanical displacements and change in matrix volume fraction) at some cleverly chosen points within each element. This mixed formulation is very effective in alleviating the shear locking problem that regular lower-order finite elements suffer from. Hence the accuracy of the predicted mechanical fields (such as displacements and stresses), as well as the fields coupled with them (such as change in matrix volume fraction, which is also called microdilatation), is improved over regular finite-element formulation. The mixed-collocation formulation is also superior over other types of previously published hybrid-mixed finite-element formulations in that it avoids the Ladyzenskaja-Babuska-Brezzi (LBB) stability conditions completely because it does not include any Lagrange multipliers. The paper also presents some numerical examples that help in providing more insight on the effect of porosity-related parameters used in microdilatation theory on the behavior of porous materials. Finally, the paper defines two limits on the coupling number; the first considers the positive definiteness of the stored energy density, whereas the second sets the limit between auxetic (having negative Poisson's ratio) and nonauxetic material behavior. (C) 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.