赵天怡

个人信息Personal Information

副教授

博士生导师

硕士生导师

主要任职:Deputy Director, Department of Civil Engineering, Dalian University of Technology

其他任职:APEC Energy Working Group Member, Member of APEC Expert Group on Energy Efficiency and Conservation (EGEE&C)

性别:男

毕业院校:哈尔滨工业大学

学位:博士

所在单位:土木工程系

学科:供热、供燃气、通风及空调工程

办公地点:厚兴楼417房间

联系方式:0411-84707734

电子邮箱:zhaotianyi@dlut.edu.cn

扫描关注

论文成果

当前位置: 中文主页 >> 科学研究 >> 论文成果

Effects of various partitions on the accuracy of virtual in-situ calibration in building energy systems

点击次数:

论文类型:期刊论文

发表时间:2021-01-10

发表刊物:JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING

卷号:32

ISSN号:2352-7102

关键字:Sensor network; Building energy system; Fault detection; Calibration domain; Bayesian inference

摘要:Sensor errors significantly affect the operation and control of building energy systems. Thus, using correct and reliable sensors can effectively reduce the energy consumption of building energy systems. Virtual in-situ calibration (VIC), which is based on Bayesian inference and the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method, can help avoid the installation of new sensors, effectively reduce the systematic and random errors of sensors, and improve the reliability of collected data. In the current study, six working conditions were designed to check the robustness and accuracy of the proposed VIC technology. It's shown that for the systematic and random error of various sensors, the improved component calibration method is the most accurate. Contrarily, the whole calibration method is the least accurate, whereas the performance of the three local calibrations is intermediate. The maximum errors of the whole, local, and component calibration methods were 973%, 112.7%, and 30%, respectively. This verifies that component calibration effectively reduces the possibility of abnormal data and also enhances the reliability of sensor measurements. For the whole and local calibration methods, the constraints between various parameters are significantly reduced because of the random and uncertain coefficients; consequently, a majority of the correction results deviate from their true values. It is not necessary to determine the sensitivity and normalizing coefficients through a complicated optimization algorithm or historical experience by using the proposed component calibration. Therefore, the component calibration method features advantages in terms of computational time and correction accuracy.